Skip to content
Technical Guide

Oil & Gas Cable Trays: Zone 1/2, ARAMCO SAES-P-104 & Shell DEP

In Zone 1 areas an incorrectly earthed tray becomes an ignition source. ARAMCO SAES-P-104, Shell DEP and IEC 60079-14 requirements covered in full.

Vajra International Engineering · Applications & Specification Team 8 min
Oil & Gas Cable Trays: Zone 1/2, ARAMCO SAES-P-104 & Shell DEP. Vajra International, cable tray, earthing & steel manufacturer and exporter, Howrah, India
Oil & Gas Cable Trays: Zone 1/2, ARAMCO SAES-P-104 & Shell DEP, technical guidance from Vajra International, ISO 9001:2015 certified cable tray, earthing & steel manufacturer and exporter, Howrah, India.

In a Zone 1 classified area, an unbonded metallic cable tray accumulates static charge from cable movement. Electrostatic discharge from the tray edge into a hydrocarbon-rich atmosphere is classified as a potential ignition source under IEC 60079-14 Cl. 9.3.4. This is not a theoretical concern, it is the reason Gulf EPC contractors and Saudi Aramco inspection teams check cable tray bonding drawings before almost any other document in the pre-construction package. Getting the earthing and bonding specification wrong in a classified area is a safety failure, not just a quality non-conformance. Here is what the standards require, what ARAMCO and Shell add beyond IEC, and what your documentation package must show before any classified area cable tray order ships.

Zone 1 vs Zone 2, what changes in cable management requirements

Under IEC 60079-10-1: Zone 1 is where explosive atmosphere is occasionally present during normal operation; Zone 2 is where it occurs only in abnormal conditions. For cable management: in Zone 1, all metallic trays must be electrically continuous and bonded to the earthing system at every joint. A separate 4 mm² minimum copper bonding conductor must run across each tray coupler, standard bolt connections through coupler plates alone are not sufficient. In Zone 2 the same continuity requirement applies, but the inspection documentation standard is generally lower (project-specific). Cable trays are not classified as equipment under IEC 60079 and do not carry ATEX certification marks, they are passive components, and the compliance obligation is in installation method and earthing, not in the tray itself.

ARAMCO SAES-P-104, what it adds beyond IEC

  • Material: SAES-P-104 requires cable tray material in classified areas to be hot-dip galvanized mild steel or fibreglass (GRP). GRP is acceptable for instrumentation cable runs; HDG steel is the default for power and earthing runs.
  • Fill ratio: SAES-P-104 specifies a maximum 50% fill for classified area trays, slightly more conservative than IEC 61537's 40% for ladder trays with power cabling.
  • Support spacing: maximum 1,500 mm span between tray support brackets; 900 mm maximum for vertical runs. Structural calculations for cantilever brackets on spans exceeding 1,200 mm must be submitted for engineering review.
  • Bonding: bonding conductors across every tray joint using stainless steel bonding links, not clip-type spring connections. MTC for the bonding wire must confirm minimum conductivity of 100% IACS.
  • Vendor approval: for major ARAMCO projects, cable tray suppliers must be listed in or approved against ARAMCO SAES-A-004 (Approved Vendor List). This is project-specific pre-qualification, not a standing product approval, submit with engineering data sheets.

Shell DEP requirements, where they differ from IEC and ARAMCO

Shell DEP 33.64.10.10 (Engineering Line and Cable Routing) adds fire-load reduction requirements for classified areas. In practice: prefer open-rung ladder construction over enclosed trunking to reduce hydrocarbon pooling risk. Where Shell specifies GRP or aluminium for Zone 2 instrumentation runs: confirm with the project's designated authority. Shell local company authority (LCA) approvals override the generic DEP. For metallic trays in Shell Zone 1 projects: the same earthing bonding requirement applies as ARAMCO, plus Shell requires that tray support design accounts for fire deluge nozzle coverage, cable trays must not obstruct deluge nozzle spray patterns on process equipment.

The earthing specification that most EPCs miss

  • Tray-to-earth connection: every cable tray run must be earthed at both ends, not just one end. For runs exceeding 30 m: intermediate earth connections at ≤30 m intervals.
  • Bonding link specification: 4 mm² minimum copper bonding conductor across every joint. IEC 61537 Annex D covers bonding continuity, do not rely on coupler bolt connections alone.
  • Earthing conductor beneath tray: per IS 3043 / IEC 62305-3, minimum 25×4 mm GI flat strip or 35 mm² stranded copper run continuously below the tray, bonded at each bracket attachment to the tray structure.
  • Post-installation test: DC loop resistance test from the most remote tray section to the earthing grid should read <1 Ω. Document in the pre-commissioning test record, this is a standard requirement in ARAMCO, Shell and TotalEnergies handover packages.

Documentation package for a Gulf oil & gas project

  • EN 10204 Type 3.1 MTC for structural steel (heat number, chemical analysis, mechanical properties, actual values, not 'complies').
  • HDG coating inspection report: XRF or magnetic measurement per ASTM A123, minimum 5 readings per m², confirming ≥85 µm average.
  • Dimensional inspection report: width, depth, sheet thickness, rung pitch against confirmed PO specification.
  • Earthing bonding schedule: showing bonding conductor specification, joint type and installation interval for the project.
  • COO and Preferential COO (CEPA/Saudi origin requirements as applicable).
  • Packing list with heat number against every bundle, pre-shipment inspection can then verify physical goods match MTC before loading.
We have prepared cable tray documentation packages for ARAMCO, ADNOC and Shell EPC projects on multiple occasions. Submit your project specification number and we build the compliant document set, engineering data sheet, MTC format, coating report and COO, within 5 working days.

ATEX/Ex-classified project? Submit your area classification, ambient temperature range and project specification number and we'll confirm compliance and prepare the document set.

Submit ATEX enquiry

About the author

Vajra International Engineering

Applications & Specification Team

Our applications engineering team draws on 50+ years of combined manufacturing experience across industrial cable management, earthing systems, structural steel and precision metal components. We write from the factory floor, from specifying raw material grades through to shipping documentation.

  • ISO 9001:2015 certified manufacturing
  • EEPC / RCMC registered exporter
  • Suppliers to Defence, Railways and Energy sectors

Frequently asked questions

Specification, compliance and procurement questions our engineering team answers most often.

When should I choose a ladder cable tray instead of a perforated tray?
Ladder trays are the right call for heavy power cabling, they give open rungs so warm air rises away from conductors, handle large cable bend radii without a tight bottom, and span further between supports. Perforated trays suit lighter control and instrumentation runs where you want continuous bottom support for smaller cables. For a data-centre busway feed, a substation cable corridor or a refinery main cable route, specify ladder. For a panel-room control loom or an instrument cable highway, perforated is enough.
When should I choose a perforated tray over a ladder tray?
Perforated trays are right when the cable route carries smaller cables, control wiring, instrumentation, Cat 6A data, BMS signals, fire-detection loops, where continuous bottom support prevents sagging between rungs. They also suit pharmaceutical cleanrooms, hospital technical floors and commercial Grade A office fit-outs where cleanliness and aesthetics matter alongside function. For heavy LT power cable above 240 mm² or long support spans exceeding 2 m, ladder tray is the better thermal and structural choice.
When is closed trunking the right choice over an open tray?
Closed trunking shields cables from dust, falling debris, mechanical impact and casual contact, choose it for switch rooms, exposed building runs, walkway-adjacent routing and areas with public access. Open trays cost less and dissipate heat better, but they expose the cabling. Many EPCs mix the two: trunking in occupied zones, trays in plant rooms.
Where does a channel tray actually save money over a full ladder or perforated tray?
Channel trays cost roughly 40–60 % less per metre than equivalent ladder, and they shine on short branch drops, solar string routing, equipment skids and single-cable runs. Anywhere the cable count is small and the run length is under 20 m, channel is the economical, code-compliant choice.
Which materials do you work with?
Mild steel, structural steel (IS 2062), stainless steel (304/316), aluminium, electrolytic copper and brass, selected and certified to application.
Which standards do you build to?
Standards-based engineering across ASTM, IEC, EN, DIN, NEMA, BS and IS, including IS 4759 / ASTM A123 galvanizing, IS 2713 gratings, and IEC 61537 / IS 12352 cable management.
Request a Quotation

Put a spec in front of the people who make it.

Send drawings, a BOQ, or a simple description. You'll get a structured quotation covering specification, finish, lead time and Incoterms, from the manufacturer, not a middleman.

  • MTC · COO · inspection reports
  • ±0.01 mm precision · in-house QA
  • FOB · CIF · CFR to all major ports

Trade updates, new product lines, export schedules.

One email when it matters. No marketing noise.

Unsubscribe any time · No spam · Vajra International Exports